HSE is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Even with early diagnosis and treatment, mortality is estimated to be between 20% and 30% [
7-
9]. HSE clinical features typically include a prodromal phase with nonspecific symptoms like fever, headache, malaise, nausea, and vomiting, followed by acute or subacute encephalopathy with focal neurologic deficits, seizures, and altered mental status or coma [
10]. In our case, the patient presented to the emergency department because of an episode of syncope. Before the patient’s admission to the neurology department, he underwent extensive cardiological evaluation in the cardiac intensive care unit, with 24-hour monitoring of vital signs and ECG. Since no other pathology except sinus bradycardia was found, pacemaker implantation was recommended. His relatives mentioned some presyncope episodes during the week preceding his admission to the hospital, while episodes of short-term disorientation during the past month were attributed to the patient’s age. Nevertheless, there were no other symptoms to raise suspicion of encephalitis. Only after day 4 of hospitalization did neurological reassessment reveal focal neurologic signs, necessitating transfer to the neurology department.
To the best of our knowledge, HSE with subacute progression has rarely been described in the literature, and only three cases exhibited syncope as the initial clinical manifestation [
4,
11]. The etiology of sinus node dysfunction in the context of HSE is not fully understood but seems to be the result of central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction rather than primary cardiac injury [
11]. Although bradycardia is often attributed to cardiac arrhythmia, sick sinus syndrome, or obstructive cardiac lesions, this case highlights the importance of considering other causes of syncope, including metabolic or CNS-related origins, even when cardiac abnormalities are present. CNS pathologies leading to bradycardia and syncope as the sole manifestation include epilepsy, cardiovascular accident, space-occupying lesions, raised intracranial pressure, and head trauma [
12]. The central neurocircuitry controlling the heart rate is very complex, involving many different regions such as the brainstem, thalami, hypothalamus, amygdala, and insular cortices. Whereas the effects of cardiovascular disease on the nervous system have been widely studied, our understanding of the effects of neurological disorders on the cardiovascular system is relatively recent [
13,
14]. In our case, the patient presented with subacute-onset HSE and dysautonomia as the initial manifestation. The heart-brain axis most probably induced bradycardia in the context of seizure activity. Bradycardia was reversed only after levetiracetam administration; it did not respond to isoprenaline. Increased heart rate has been reported to occur in 64% to 100% of temporal lobe seizures, while bradycardia has been reported to occur in only a small percentage of cases and has been described as ictal bradycardia syndrome [
15-
17]. The exact pathophysiology leading to ictal bradycardia syndrome is not fully understood. Potential mechanisms include increased parasympathetic activity or disrupted sympathetic activity caused by ictal activity. Ictal discharges, especially those of the temporal lobe origin, can spread to the brain regions involved in autonomic control, influencing the parasympathetic and sympathetic outputs to the heart. The insular cortex, amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, hypothalamus, and brainstem nuclei are part of the above-described “brain-heart axis” [
13]. A previous report described a case of ictal asystole secondary to suspected HSE [
18]. Our case highlights the importance of determining the underlying cause of syncope according to the published guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology [
19]. Despite the normal neurologic examination and initial brain imaging, a broader investigation of the patient, including neurological reassessment and timely lumbar puncture, as soon as bradycardia did not respond to sympathomimetic drug administration, could have led to earlier HSE diagnosis. It should be noted that, despite the response to anticonvulsant therapy, the patient’s overall condition deteriorated rapidly. The key determinant of clinical response and reduction of morbidity in HSE is the timely administration of antiviral medication. Anticonvulsants have been proven beneficial when administered adjunctively to ameliorate epileptic manifestations [
20]. Prompt and effective treatment with antiviral agents is crucial for achieving favorable outcomes.
This case highlights the importance of early recognition of the atypical subacute course of HSE and its possible presentation in the emergency department as an acute cardiologic event. Early diagnosis is crucial, as prompt initiation of antiviral therapy may lead to neurological recovery, while treatment delays often lead to mortality.